Technology of deception

Rubric: time
Friday, 22 May 2009 г.
Viewed: 551

When close — rotin that far.

When am — rotin that no.

When strong — rotin that weak.

When does not want — rotin that want.

When show, rotin that does not show all of it.

Technology of deception is successive change placed hard and empty. Two youth — two friend played war-games and both were talented on military business. They became the grown more man. And at one the envy appeared to successes other. He said a prince, that in spite of friendship, considers a debt to report that the friend of him planned to pass to the side of enemies. Evidences however not enough it was, and a prince spared slandered, only ordered only ordered to chop off him feet, what not able to hurry to the enemies. But to the enemies soon hurried not he, but slanderer, that in life always and happens. A prince offered to remaining the place of war-lord, but that did not accept. He considered that above his soldiers will chuckle, if they will have a legless war-lord. But, actually, managed troops.

Certainly, friends throughout the year, while they again were not taken by a military fate, held each other in memory and eyeshot, continuing a taciturn dialog and rivalry. But took in moment, unprofitable for a righteous man, when correlation of quantity of troops was incommensurable. And he hurried together with the not numerous army. And more lucky competitor pursued him, trying not to miss out a so opportunity to dot in a question about that, who is more talented.

Exemplary presentation on the quantity of army gave the number of sites of fire from fires, kindled an escaping army on stands. And our legless hero ordered the army to suffer and kindle every day there are half as much, than previous fires. Army escaping melted on eyes pursuer which just like this and judged about its quantity. He carried with its pursuit and together with the small detachment...

A manuscript is torn off here, but we can guess about that happened.

Two deception, but as they are excellent.

First, related to slander on a friend, resulted in escape from a prince, as in the calculations of deceiver not included in any way, that a prince would leave a competitor in living. And to live next to a living witness unbearably. In a primary plan in any way did not enter to become the opponent of prince, opposite, there was a desire to become his war-lord. In the total — it was necessary to abandon a motherland and militate against it. Having way will never act so. That means here — to deceive the first.

The second deceptions are deception of just retribution — based on self-deceit of presumptuous opponent. It is just deception, not based on slander.

Not having a way not able to distinguish hard from empty, as not able to distinguish it in itself.

google.com bobrdobr.ru del.icio.us technorati.com linkstore.ru news2.ru rumarkz.ru memori.ru moemesto.ru