This history reached to us and manages us. Like other histories. And to the next generations of warriors. It was passed oral. And could be distorted. Not Enough to make a good beautiful thing. It is necessary to pack, that at delivery to address it not . That on a road it did not steal. How to be not troubled about packing?!

Then and with an act. It is possible to accomplish an act. And only an act really sets a value. Without acts there are not values. It is necessary yet to pack an act. That he was passed oral correctly. Or even the most important in him.

A war-lord accomplished two act at once. They are constrained between itself and help each other. A war-lord did not say a messenger: you, brother, were late! Could say, as execution of guilty vassal took place already. In fact it is possible to say: it was late. And it is possible to say: hurried to execute! Saying about a delay is to say: early an emperor handed so large power me, see, I hurried, and executed a man, whose execution would abolish, if a messenger arrived a bit earlier!

A war-lord bossed to execute a child, because if executed any grown man, let even indeed innocent, a rumour necessarily would add this grown man his own guilt. At the best the war-lord ascribed to an error, entangling of guilt of two people. Therefore a child here is part of packing. Before to do an act, think about his packing. Such meditations can change maintenance of act. To do him cleaner and more clear.

An act must be clean and clear.

Execution of child

Here full-length a question gets up about morality of the offered technologies. And not enough it would be to say: I disapprove execution of child! And to go farther. From the song of word will not abort. How to be with a child, if prosperity of army, and, safety of country, and and safety of the same child is related to his execution?

That will say persons highly moral? Whose execution, certainly, unit admits. But as with an army? Does not know, I am not military! And an army needs a country? Well, probably, needed. But as a war-lord must act? Does not know, I am not military. And if he consults by you, what you will advise? Hardness me to judge, I am not military! Well well, we do not execute your child! Be that will be! But if an army will fall to pieces and a country will perish — these many deaths will be on your conscience! And I that thus?! It is not my business! I not! in!-енн!-ный! Talked.

Sense of talk we see. you do, and I will reprobate you. Ot to complete amorality one step.

We remember this question well: if on the bowl of scales to put all happiness of the world from one side, and one innocently spilled teardrop of one child — de autre part, — what you will choose? About, all happiness of the world does not cost the innocently spilled teardrop!

Well but as will decipher the world happiness?! Well will say even, that at his absence one of many innocently children will appear also? There is life of one child on one bowl, on other is a teardrop other? Or will say and now, that life of one child does not cost a teardrop other?

Thereon speculative way there is not success.

We said that who has way, always rights. It so. And that, et al possible, if a way is a way of good. And it also so.

We began words about a way, as about a way to the house. Ways to itself. And nothing changed since. Ways otherwise, what can not be the way of good. But we do not insist on this word is good. Word good is dim and multiple-valued reflects a way. A way can be seen, and good it is not. Good consists of acts which a way prompts us. And, appear we hard up, not speculative, but real, a way will specify us, that to do.