Force and weakness
A son asked a father:
— What your force, Father, is in? All days long you carry the enormous barrels of trees on shoulders, and hardness to notice, that you got tired?
— It so. And force — in indifference. However me, what tree I carry; thick or thin, long or short, heavy or easy.
Yes, it so. Sila — always in indifference. In indifference to any obstacle, because no from them is able to stop a man for his way. Proving not rights, the right does not prove. Proving is weak. By logic force will not replace. Sila of will and spirit is a substance, distant from geometry. Proving — always suppliant, he asks, that to his proofs belonged unindifferently. The right is strong. He Knows that he rights. And it enough.
His rightness is noticeable. It fills all space round him, even when he is quiet. His look convinces every more arguments and stops the outflow of languages. It is unimportant, and or not you talk, it is unimportant, what arguments over bring, important you talk and or not from force, or from a weakness.
It is possible to say and from force. It means, you would say and no, but decided to give a consent. It is possible to say and from a weakness. It means that not in your forces to say no. It is possible to say from force. It means that you would give a consent, but consider necessary to say no. It is possible to say it is not from a weakness. It means that not in your forces to give a consent. That, who has a way, always rights. A rightness is a sign of way. A rightness increases and force physical. Not by chance before a rightness was determined in a duel, with a weapon in hands.
Ways do not intersect
Ways do not intersect. People, having a way, can not prevent each other. There is a place for all. Because way, not building and not fruit of fantasy. He exists while there is a man. Him it is possible to see and know. Him it is possible to be frightened, embarrassed or happy. But for each he only one. Not to choose him — does not mean, to choose other. It means — to live without a way.
At first we choose a way, then a way chooses us. And does not can a step otherwise, what on him.
And like that both crowd of intellectual people is capable taking it easy to get through narrow doors collision-free and tensions, only testing pleasure from the mutual refined courtesy and people having a way can not prevent each other.
At that, who has a way, time is always enough. Impolite and unethical only slave of moment, not having eternity.
A look from the future is always quiet.
When in Veyskom reign the place of the first ministers was freed, he was strongly hurt, knowing other dignitary about setting. He came to more lucky dignitary and said:
— Let us talk about our merits, well?!
— Let.
— For whom of war-lords in his army soldiers and officers with gladness go on death, for you or for me?
— For you.
— Who is able to manage officials, to be near people, to fill the treasure-house of the state, I or you ?
— You.
— Who protects a country so, that strong hostile army and dare not turn a head in our side, you or I?
— You.
— At that rate, if I am higher than you in all respects, why according to the regulations you are higher than me.
— Can and I to put question? When a sovereign is very young, and the state is unsteady, when dignitaries do not support him, and people do not yet trust him, to whom at that rate to trust the state — to you or me?
He was some time quiet, and then answered:
— To you.
— Here therefore I am higher than you.