Fear and intrepidity

Strakh— essential sense. He can not be ignored, it uses to them. In fact placed him in a man for blessing of man. It is good useful sense which can humiliate a man not only, him to the zoon, but can elevate. From fear to reflect upon a friend, can and to endow own life. Not then main, that a man is afraid of, and then, what he is afraid preeminently, for what he is afraid preeminently.

Why for women battle exercises began to turn out? It can be from fear? And why a war-lord is ready to go along with this army and battle? In fact with the intimidated army it is hardly good to have business. Here already reason in intrepidity. Soldiers are not afraid that a war-lord will punish them for stranger guilt. If not soldier, but officer, is guilty, will punish an officer. Soldier has nothing to be afraid, if he is not guilty. It is intrepidity. Well, and if guilty? Will punish certainly. One time and an officer did not spare. Combination of fear and intrepidity is basis of army. An opponent is not frightful. A chief is not frightful, if execute the debt. But it is terrible not to perform duty. Here not wait forgiveness. Transition from fear to intrepidity is a border sharp. Etoy outline a debt, duties, order a sharp border. That hard to dissociate from empty. Execution of officers produced such separation.

It is impossible to spread the border of fear.

It is impossible to spread the scopes of intrepidity.

All the place, having exact scopes.

Last order of war-lord.

The last order of war-lord must be executed. It is an old, faithful rule which rescued a not alone prince from itself.

What temptation to interdict a war-lord, to abolish his unpleasant order! But what sense to take off him, if however much all orders already given by him will have to be executed! Take-then it is possible, but not executing already given order is impossible. Such is a rule.

It is not governed more valuable, than those, that protect a man from itself.

The law of reverse force does not have. So society defends oneself from itself.

Change of any rules backdated is a visiting-card of treachery and weakness. Even children renounce to play such games.

There is not more faithful method to lose honour and trust, how to change an agreement backdated to the benefit. But it is not and more rapid and faithful method to check up decency of partner, how to allow him to do it. Such verification dissociates empty from hard and protects from a large misfortune.

A prince survived it.