A fight for is the bloodiest type of fight. Confrontation is here most:

— Give at short notice! Release! Stand! Immediately answer!

Passions . It hard on hard. Sparks and losses. Sweaty bodies and dishevelled hairs. Or — or. A skilful warrior avoids it, as untalented. And constantly puts an opponent in position, when to fight it is already late for . A fight for the future is the unique type of fight, deserving skilful. Fight for he can begin with one purpose — to fix the surrender of opponent. We, certainly, do not talk about covinous motions. As such can come forward ostensible fight for or the pas.

An opponent is ready to defend a height and remove an attack. This attack and would be a fight for . But if a successful round is accomplished, then an opponent can hastily leave this height without every fight. The correct conduct of fight for the future delivers from a fight for .

Who wants a direct collision — pushes slightly to the fight for : no, let him you now answer! Not release! Who wants a conflict to settle, translates in a fight for the future: well well, and then that you will with it do? To him and will give! Let takes away, will look, as he then will appeal to us with some request. Who wants to show a man out of itself, to deprive his sensible reason, mentions about the pas: as he you at all!

But a fight for the future must not close an opponent possibilities to see a way, and to approach him to vision of way. Never make a yet greater opponent out of opponent. Again the question is not about covinous motions which war is not without.

To turn to the account is success.

To turn to the account is success, to fight for a benefit — danger.

To turn to the account, get it without a fight — here task. Fight for a benefit — same, uttermost measure. In an ideal — it is never necessary for it to fight.

If an advantageous height is not busy at yet an opponent is large success, it it is necessary to occupy. But if it is already busy — to try to take away it for an opponent is an extreme measure, almost for certain lead to the superfluous victims. A difference is great between these two cases.

If to put a car at a place on which to you nobody especially applied, and this place is comfortable for the daily use, then drove you. But if it is a place before also systematic occupied the car of your neighbour or colleague, there can be the known tensions.

If some benefit can not be got without a fight, then it is better to give up it with that to search other, yet not busy an opponent. If the waiver of it is impossible because of its too high meaningfulness for your position, fight it is necessary to conduct for it, following the same principle: to turn to the account is success, to fight for it is a danger.

It means that motion to the benefit must be broken on the row of intermediate benefits, chosen so that each of them is not yet busy at an opponent. If some from these intermediate benefits are however inaccessible without a fight, then it is necessary to do yet more shallow division. Will look, for example, as some masters of this business are built on in a turn in which did not stand. As walk next to a that mestome in a turn, in which want to be wedged. As turns become parallell, however attaching significance exactness of location in it. Pushing nobody, with anybody not conflicting, turn to the account which before was already busy. It that is named to pull a blanket on itself. Not pulling off from other, but using every case of improvement of the position.